DecisioQ System Architecture Decision Concepts Decision List API Guide Developer Center Decision Studio Quick Start Playground End-to-End Examples

AUTO-AUCT-044 End-to-End Example

Approve High-Risk Purchase using Identity, the secured Knowledge Catalog, DKS token propagation, catalog constraints, and Prepared Decision Input execution.

Automotive Auto Auctions Compliance & Risk TOPSIS
IdentityIssue bearer token
CatalogDiscover decision metadata
ProfileSelect weights and scenario
ExecuteApply constraints and rank
ExplainReview result context

Overview

AUTO-AUCT-044, Approve High-Risk Purchase, determines whether a high-risk auction vehicle purchase should be approved, escalated, deferred, or rejected.

Decision ID
AUTO-AUCT-044
Decision Name
Approve High-Risk Purchase
Industry Profile
auto-auctions-approve-high-risk-purchase-auto-auct-044 version 1.0.0
Default Profile
balanced
Default Scenario
standard
Catalog
DKR-AUTO-RUNTIME-001, version 13.9.3
The deterministic Decision Engine ranks eligible purchase cases. AI explanation text, when returned, is explanatory only and must not choose, rerank, or override the deterministic result.

Understanding This Decision

Approve High-Risk Purchase helps Compliance & Risk teams compare candidate purchase cases when profit opportunity must be weighed against risk exposure, title confidence, repair uncertainty, and management priority.

Business question

Which purchase case should be recommended for approve high-risk purchase in the selected Auto Auctions context?

Expected outcome

A recommended purchase case or ranked set of purchase cases with the criteria and constraints that most influenced the result.

Typical users

Operations managers, compliance teams, auction buyers, risk reviewers, and integration teams building controlled purchase workflows.

Decision boundary

Use this decision to compare submitted purchase cases. It supports business judgment and does not replace required legal, title, compliance, or management approvals.

Architecture

  1. Request a token from the Identity service.
  2. Use the returned jwtToken as the bearer token.
  3. Load the catalog and decision detail from DKS.
  4. Build a Prepared Decision Input using canonical criterion IDs.
  5. Execute the decision through DDE.
  6. Use X-Request-Id and X-Correlation-Id for tracing across DDE and DKS.
Token propagation: when DDE needs authoritative decision metadata during execution, it forwards the caller's bearer token to DKS with the request identifiers. This lets the catalog and execution records share the same security and tracing context.

Authentication

Request a secure session token from Identity. The current token response field is jwtToken.

Token request
POST https://identity.vinquery.com/connect/token
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "clientId": "{clientId}",
  "clientSecret": "{clientSecret}",
  "audience": "vinquery:api:decisioq"
}

Catalog Discovery

Use DKS to discover the catalog and then load complete metadata for AUTO-AUCT-044.

Catalog
GET https://dks.vinquery.com/decisioncatalog
Authorization: Bearer {jwtToken}
Decision Detail
GET https://dks.vinquery.com/decisioncatalog/decisions/AUTO-AUCT-044
Authorization: Bearer {jwtToken}

Criteria

Criterion IDs are intentionally stable machine identifiers. Display labels are for users; request values should be keyed by canonical criterionId.

Criterion IDNameDirectionWeightValidation
expected_profit_marginExpected Profit Marginmaximize25non_negative_currency
risk_exposureRisk Exposureminimize30score_0_to_100
title_confidenceTitle Confidencemaximize15score_0_to_100
repair_uncertaintyRepair Uncertaintyminimize15score_0_to_100
management_priorityManagement Prioritymaximize15score_0_to_100

Constraint Processing

This decision includes one catalog-defined hard constraint. DKS returns the constraint with the decision detail, and DDE evaluates it before criteria-based ranking.

Verified Catalog ConstraintStatusEffect
AUTO-AUCT-044-TITLE-CONFIDENCE-MIN-80Hard, enabled, mandatoryRequires title_confidence >= 80 before a candidate can participate in ranking.
Eligible and Excluded Candidates
{
  "constraintSummary": {
    "definedConstraintCount": 1,
    "activeConstraintCount": 1,
    "eligibleOptionCount": 2,
    "excludedOptionCount": 1,
    "eligibleOptions": [
      "option-1",
      "option-2"
    ],
    "excludedOptions": [
      {
        "optionId": "option-3",
        "reasons": [
          "Title confidence is below the minimum threshold of 80."
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
Constraint Handling Pattern
const constraints = decisionDetail.constraints || [];
if (constraints.length > 0) {
  // DDE applies catalog constraints before ranking.
  // Excluded candidates appear in response.constraintSummary.excludedOptions.
}

const summary = response.constraintSummary;
const excluded = response.decisionResult?.excludedOptions || [];

Excluded candidates do not participate in ranking because hard constraints are evaluated before scoring. For AUTO-AUCT-044, option-3 is excluded from the showcase sample because its title confidence is below the catalog threshold.

Industry Profile

The generated integration asset uses $.auctionLots as the business options path, $.optionId as the option ID, and $.name as the option display name.

Business Data PathCriterion ID
option.financial.expectedProfitMarginexpected_profit_margin
option.risk.riskExposurerisk_exposure
option.compliance.and.risk.titleConfidencetitle_confidence
option.compliance.and.risk.repairUncertaintyrepair_uncertainty
option.compliance.and.risk.managementPrioritymanagement_priority
Business Data Fragment
{
  "auctionLots": [
    {
      "optionId": "option-1",
      "name": "Controlled High-Margin Purchase",
      "financial": {
        "expectedProfitMargin": 5200
      },
      "risk": {
        "riskExposure": 12
      },
      "compliance": {
        "and": {
          "risk": {
            "titleConfidence": 90,
            "repairUncertainty": 12,
            "managementPriority": 90
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}
Prepared Option Values
{
  "optionId": "option-1",
  "name": "Controlled High-Margin Purchase",
  "values": {
    "expected_profit_margin": 5200,
    "risk_exposure": 12,
    "title_confidence": 90,
    "repair_uncertainty": 12,
    "management_priority": 90
  }
}

Profiles and Scenarios

A profile changes criterion weights. A scenario describes the operating context for the execution. The active DKS catalog exposes these choices with the decision detail response.

Profile IDNamePurpose
balancedBalancedPreserves the default DKS criterion weights.
cost_focusedCost FocusedPlaces stronger emphasis on minimized cost, fee, and expense criteria.
quality_focusedQuality FocusedPlaces stronger emphasis on maximized quality, confidence, value, and performance criteria.
risk_averseRisk AversePlaces stronger emphasis on risk reduction, compliance confidence, and operational reliability.
Scenario IDNameUse When
standardStandard Operating ScenarioRoutine auction decision execution.
limited_budgetLimited BudgetPurchasing or operating capital is constrained, requiring greater cost discipline.
high_demandHigh DemandMarket demand is strong and timely inventory acquisition is more valuable.
risk_controlRisk ControlOperational or compliance risk is elevated and conservative decisioning is preferred.

Prepared Input

For Prepared Decision Input, send decisionId, selected profile/scenario IDs, and option values keyed by canonical criterion ID. This request intentionally does not duplicate values under display labels.

Prepared Decision Input JSON
{
  "decisionId": "AUTO-AUCT-044",
  "profileId": "balanced",
  "scenarioId": "standard",
  "algorithm": "TOPSIS",
  "weightStrategy": "Manual",
  "runSensitivity": false,
  "requestContext": {
    "correlationId": "auto-auct-044-demo-001"
  },
  "options": [
    {
      "optionId": "option-1",
      "name": "Controlled High-Margin Purchase",
      "values": {
        "expected_profit_margin": 5200,
        "risk_exposure": 12,
        "title_confidence": 90,
        "repair_uncertainty": 12,
        "management_priority": 90
      }
    },
    {
      "optionId": "option-2",
      "name": "Borderline Risk Purchase",
      "values": {
        "expected_profit_margin": 4700,
        "risk_exposure": 22,
        "title_confidence": 82,
        "repair_uncertainty": 22,
        "management_priority": 82
      }
    },
    {
      "optionId": "option-3",
      "name": "Defer Pending Documentation",
      "values": {
        "expected_profit_margin": 4300,
        "risk_exposure": 34,
        "title_confidence": 74,
        "repair_uncertainty": 34,
        "management_priority": 74
      }
    }
  ]
}

Execute

cURL
curl -X POST "https://dde.vinquery.com/api/v1/decide" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${DECISIOQ_TOKEN}" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "X-Correlation-Id: auto-auct-044-demo-001" \
  --data @auto-auct-044-execute.json

DDE retrieves authoritative criteria, validation metadata, and constraints from DKS, excludes candidates that fail mandatory hard constraints, executes the deterministic ranking, and returns the decision result plus execution metadata.

Interpret the Result

The successful response is centered on decisionResult. The winner and ranking are deterministic outputs; optional explanation fields add context but do not change the ranking.

Successful Response Shape
{
  "service": "decisioq",
  "version": "7.6.3",
  "requestId": "0HNE...",
  "operation": "Decide",
  "success": true,
  "decisionType": "AUTO-AUCT-044",
  "decisionVersion": "13.9.3",
  "timestampUtc": "2026-07-19T00:00:00Z",
  "decisionResult": {
    "winner": "option-1",
    "confidence": 91,
    "ranking": [
      {
        "optionId": "option-1",
        "score": 0.91,
        "breakdown": {
          "expected_profit_margin": 0.25,
          "risk_exposure": 0.30,
          "title_confidence": 0.15,
          "repair_uncertainty": 0.15,
          "management_priority": 0.15
        },
        "normalizationBreakdown": {}
      },
      {
        "optionId": "option-2",
        "score": 0.84,
        "breakdown": {},
        "normalizationBreakdown": {}
      }
    ],
    "excludedOptions": [
      {
        "optionId": "option-3",
        "reasons": [
          "Title confidence is below the minimum threshold of 80."
        ]
      }
    ],
    "explanation": {
      "summary": "Controlled High-Margin Purchase ranked highest among eligible purchase cases.",
      "strengths": [],
      "weaknesses": [],
      "exclusions": [
        "option-3: Title confidence is below the minimum threshold of 80."
      ]
    }
  },
  "constraintSummary": {
    "definedConstraintCount": 1,
    "activeConstraintCount": 1,
    "eligibleOptionCount": 2,
    "excludedOptionCount": 1,
    "eligibleOptions": [
      "option-1",
      "option-2"
    ],
    "excludedOptions": [
      {
        "optionId": "option-3",
        "reasons": [
          "Title confidence is below the minimum threshold of 80."
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "warnings": [],
  "requestContext": {
    "correlationId": "auto-auct-044-demo-001"
  }
}
WinnerThe selected option ID in decisionResult.winner.
RankingOnly eligible options ordered by deterministic score.
ExclusionsHard-constraint failures listed under constraintSummary and decisionResult.excludedOptions.

Sensitivity Analysis

Set runSensitivity to true on catalog execution when the client wants recommendation-stability information in the same response. The sensitivity engine perturbs criterion weights by controlled factors and reports whether the winner remains stable.

Sensitivity Result Shape
{
  "sensitivityResult": {
    "stableWinner": true,
    "winner": "option-1",
    "mostSensitiveCriterion": "risk_exposure",
    "confidence": 95,
    "criterionImpacts": {
      "risk_exposure": 0.1842
    },
    "winnerChangeCounts": {
      "risk_exposure": 0
    }
  }
}

Use sensitivity output to decide whether a recommendation is robust enough for automation or should be reviewed by a person.

Explanation of Decision Result

Every successful response can include deterministic explanation text under decisionResult.explanation and explanation. If the optional AI layer is enabled by the service, the response may also include an ai block with structured business-language explanation fields.

AI Explanation Shape
{
  "ai": {
    "enabled": true,
    "generated": true,
    "schemaValidated": true,
    "explanation": {
      "summary": "The selected purchase case provided the strongest overall balance of margin, risk, confidence, and management priority.",
      "whyRecommended": "It met the hard title-confidence threshold and ranked highest among eligible cases.",
      "keyDrivers": [],
      "tradeoffs": [],
      "competitors": [],
      "sensitivitySummary": "Sensitivity analysis was not included in this response.",
      "scenarioSummary": "The standard scenario was selected.",
      "risks": [],
      "nextSteps": [],
      "assumptions": []
    }
  }
}
Explanation output is supporting context. Business-facing pages should render the explanation, warnings, assumptions, and limitations without provider branding.

Tracing and Logs

Use request identifiers to connect client, catalog, and execution activity during support or integration testing.

X-Request-Id
Optional client-supplied request ID. If omitted, the server generates one.
X-Correlation-Id
Optional client correlation value propagated from DDE to DKS.
requestContext.correlationId
Optional payload value echoed in the response and used for tracing.
executionTrace
Advanced execution metadata including selected profile, selected scenario, effective weights, and applied constraints.

Code Examples

These examples demonstrate the current DecisioQ flow:

  1. Request jwtToken from https://identity.vinquery.com/connect/token.
  2. Load AUTO-AUCT-044 metadata from https://dks.vinquery.com/decisioncatalog/decisions/AUTO-AUCT-044.
  3. Execute a Prepared Decision Input at https://dde.vinquery.com/api/v1/decide.

Set these environment variables before running any companion example:

Environment variables
DECISIOQ_CLIENT_ID
DECISIOQ_CLIENT_SECRET

Optional:
DECISIOQ_AUDIENCE=vinquery:api:decisioq
DECISIOQ_IDENTITY_URL=https://identity.vinquery.com/connect/token
DECISIOQ_DKS_URL=https://dks.vinquery.com
DECISIOQ_DDE_URL=https://dde.vinquery.com

Download the source files directly:

Troubleshooting

SymptomLikely CauseWhat to Check
401 UnauthorizedMissing, expired, or invalid bearer token.Request a fresh jwtToken from Identity and send it as Authorization: Bearer ....
Decision not foundThe decision ID is not in the active catalog.Load /decisioncatalog/decisions/AUTO-AUCT-044 and confirm the ID is published.
Validation failedA required criterion value is missing or outside its rule.Use canonical criterion IDs and keep score values in the expected range.
Candidate excludedA mandatory hard constraint failed.Review constraintSummary.excludedOptions for the exact candidate and reason.
HTML error responseAn upstream hosted service failed before returning JSON.Check service health and server logs for Identity, DKS, or DDE.

Production Checklist

Security

Keep API Consumer credentials and jwtTokens on the server side. Use HTTPS, short-lived bearer tokens, and an API Consumer linked to a DecisioQ account for usage accounting.

Catalog

Load decision metadata from DKS and cache cautiously. Refresh when catalog versions change.

Request Quality

Use canonical criterion IDs, validate value ranges, and send at least two candidate options.

Constraints

Show excluded candidates separately. Do not include them in user-facing ranking tables.

Explanation

Display explanation text as supporting context only. Never let AI text override deterministic results.

User Experience

Show business labels to users and keep raw execution trace collapsed for advanced diagnostics.