Auto Parts · AUTO-PART-039

How should we handle this parts core charge?

Compare core-charge handling options using return evidence, supplier credit, policy compliance, financial exposure, and customer relationship impact.

Try the comparisonSee the full example

From business evidence to an explained recommendation

1

Enter comparable evidence

Edit the fictional samples using your own consistent measurements.

2

Choose your priorities

Use balanced priorities or generate AHP weights from pairwise judgments. Weights express importance, not option performance.

3

Review the tradeoffs

Run the comparison, inspect the ranking and API response, then change a value and rerun.

Interactive decision

Compare your options

Evaluate three handling options for the same return. Keep the core condition and timeliness evidence consistent across options; vary the expected outcomes where justified. Policy compliance below 70 excludes an option before ranking; AHP cannot override this rule. The retained-charge sample deliberately falls below the threshold to demonstrate exclusion.

Samples are fictional and editable. Scores use 0–100, percentages use 0–100, and ratings use 1–5. Use a common currency for monetary values. The recommendation supports human review; no operational action is taken.

Understand the inputs

  • Core Condition Score: Condition of the returned core relative to acceptance standards. Higher values are preferred. Unit: Score.
  • Return Timeliness Score: Whether the core was returned within the accepted time window. Higher values are preferred. Unit: Score.
  • Supplier Credit Likelihood: Likelihood that the supplier will accept and credit the core. Higher values are preferred. Unit: Score.
  • Customer Policy Compliance: Degree to which customer core handling complies with published policy. Higher values are preferred. Unit: Score.
  • Financial Exposure: Financial exposure if the core is rejected or mishandled. Lower values are preferred. Unit: Currency.
  • Relationship Impact Score: Potential customer relationship impact of the handling decision. Higher values are preferred. Unit: Score.

Move from demo to workflow

AUTO-PART-039: full implementation exampleBusiness Data, preparation, request, response, and interpretation.Understand AHP weights and option scoresLearn how priorities differ from performance values.All interactive showcasesExplore more business workflows.